Meta agrees to $459 million in state payments over Cambridge Analytica claims

Meta has agreed to pay $459.3 million to participating states as part of a settlement that releases the company from claims tied to the Cambridge Analytica scandal, even claims that were not yet known or had not yet arisen. The settlement comes as a separate New Mexico judge has ordered Meta to pay $25 billion over deceptive statements about data privacy.

The agreement releases Meta from claims that states did not know existed, covering unknown and unaccrued claims, and does so « fully, finally, and forever ». The release forms part of a broader settlement reached in August 2026, in which Meta agreed to pay about $17 billion to settle a child-safety matter with the states. The $459.3 million figure is the portion allocated to Cambridge Analytica claims from the states that participated.

New Mexico opted out of the multistate settlement and took its case to trial. In that case, the judge ordered Meta to pay $25 billion. The penalty is tied to the company’s deceptive statements about data privacy rather than to the harms caused by Cambridge Analytica itself, a distinction that the reporting emphasizes.

Cambridge Analytica used Facebook user data without permission to build voter profiles in 2016. The judge found that Meta knew its investigations into misuse of apps were inadequate, and that the company failed to notify users about thousands of misused apps. The reporting also describes the Gloo app, used by US churches, which reportedly relied on psychographic profiling.

The scandal has drawn scrutiny from several bodies over the years. The US Senate Intelligence Committee was unable to obtain Cambridge Analytica’s corporate communications. The UK Information Commissioner’s Office held the company’s servers, but did not formally share information with the Senate panel. UK probes focused on the Brexit referendum rather than on US events.

Earlier resolutions included a 2019 FTC order that carried a $5 billion penalty and a 2022 class action settlement. Former FTC commissioner Rohit Chopra has argued that Meta’s gains and its exposure were underestimated. One question remains open: what Meta gained from enabling the abuses.

Meta says it will appeal the New Mexico ruling and has described the case as a tax on speech. The company’s position on the broader settlement terms has not been detailed beyond the release language itself.

2Views

Author

Caroline Mercer

World News Correspondent

Caroline Mercer covers public affairs, politics, business, culture and daily news for Core Memo. The role focuses on verification, context, and clear explanations for readers.

All articles by this author