Memorandum
- From
- Delaney Sawyer via Fortune | FORTUNE
- Date
- Filed
- Politics·5 min to read
- Re
Medicaid Work Rules Start in January as GOP States Demand Proof of Medical Frailty
ReMedicaid Work Rules Start in January as GOP States Demand Proof of Medical Frailty
New federal Medicaid work requirements take effect in January, and at least six Republican-led states are going beyond the law by requiring documentation immediately from people who say they are too medically frail to work. Democrats in 25 states are suing, while advocates warn that people who cannot afford a doctor may lose coverage.
Work requirements for millions of Medicaid beneficiaries begin across the United States in January, the product of President Donald Trump's 2025 tax cut and policy law. The mandate applies to up to 20 million lower-income adults without children at home who are enrolled through the program's optional expansion in 40 states and the District of Columbia. Beneficiaries must work or volunteer at least 80 hours a month, or attend school at least half-time, to keep coverage, with exceptions that include medical frailty.
At least six Republican-led states are imposing tougher rules than the law requires, particularly over how someone proves they are too medically frail to work. Federal regulations allow a state to accept a recipient's own word for the first year, a process known as self-attestation. Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, New Hampshire, North Carolina and Ohio have laws or policies that bar self-attestation for the work-requirement exception starting next year, and advocates in other states are pushing to follow.
That stricter approach worries patient advocates, who say it could shut out people who qualify for an exemption but cannot produce paperwork. «Someone may not be able to work, but they can't see a doctor because they can't afford it. So they're now applying for Medicaid,» said Jennifer Tolbert, director of state health policy and data at the research organization KFF. «But Medicaid is saying you need documentation from a provider.»
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services published a rule in June that went further than states and providers expected. It said a person's condition must «significantly impair» their ability to work, volunteer or attend school as required to qualify for an exemption. The law had described medically frail people as including those with substance use disorders, disabilities or serious medical conditions.
Supporters of documentation requirements argue they are needed to protect program integrity. The conservative Foundation for Government Accountability has encouraged states not to make it too easy to avoid the work rules. «Self-attestation is fraud-by-design,» said Jonathan Ingram, the group's vice president of research and policy. «It is a policy developed by bureaucrats to maximize enrollment at the expense of program integrity.» Self-attestation is made under penalty of perjury, so people who lie can face criminal charges, though such charges are rare.
In Missouri, Republican state Rep. Darin Chappell worked with the foundation on a proposed constitutional amendment that would have required «documentary evidence» of work or an exemption and specifically prohibited self-attestation. The measure passed the House but died without a Senate vote. Chappell plans to try again next year. «If someone has a debilitating physical ailment — or mental ailment for that matter — something that prohibits them from working, that's totally legitimate,» he said. «But we're not taking anybody's word for it.»
The changes are projected to save the federal government $887 billion over the next decade and leave 7.5 million fewer people with health insurance, according to the Congressional Budget Office's 2025 estimate. Democrats in 25 states are suing, arguing the rules are too harsh.
States will be allowed to accept self-attestation once each time a person enrolls starting in 2028. After that, documentation would be required at least every 12 months to verify that a condition still exists and still prevents work. The government expects states to rely increasingly on third-party data, such as workers' compensation claims or prescription information, and to require a doctor's certification or a disability award letter when databases do not capture a condition.
Implementing the requirements is already straining state systems. Many states must spend millions of dollars upgrading computer systems, and some are struggling with changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program required under the same law. In Arizona, enrollment in SNAP fell 55% from April 2025 to April 2026, the largest drop in the country, with more than 400,000 fewer people receiving benefits. The state attributed the decline largely to difficulties carrying out new federal requirements, which produced higher call volumes and additional verification.
3
