Memorandum
- From
- Delaney Sawyer via TIME.com
- Date
- Filed
- Society·6 min to read
- Re
Community Choirs Draw New Singers as Group Singing Shows Measurable Benefits
ReCommunity Choirs Draw New Singers as Group Singing Shows Measurable Benefits
Choirs are attracting a new generation of singers as research links group singing to social cohesion, lower stress, and physical health benefits, even as communal singing has declined over the past century.
Community choirs are drawing a new generation of singers across the United States, a shift that comes as researchers document measurable physical, mental, and social benefits from singing in groups. The trend is unfolding against a backdrop of rising loneliness, political polarization, and public dissatisfaction, and it has revived an age-old practice that had been fading for decades.
People have sung together since the earliest human societies, using coordinated rhythmic chants for hunting and socializing, and delivering oral storytelling through song in forms ranging from the Greek chorus to work songs and sea shanties. That tradition declined steeply over the last century as radio, television, and recorded music encouraged passive, individual listening. Outside religious settings and concerts, many Americans now encounter group singing only sporadically, perhaps while singing «Happy Birthday.»
Yet choirs are attracting newcomers, including people with no musical training. Viral videos show one-day choirs in which crowds of strangers gather in warehouses to sing pop songs together. People with dementia are finding joy in singing together as musical memory outlasts the ability to speak, and unhoused residents in San Diego have formed a chorus that has created community.
Researchers point to several reasons for the appeal. Singing together is a low-cost, inclusive activity, and recent studies show it helps bolster social cohesion while providing physical benefits that include lowering blood pressure and cortisol levels and improving lung health.
Dr. Frank Russo, a psychology professor at Toronto Metropolitan University who studies what happens physically, mentally, and socially when people sing together, cited the recent World Cup as an example. «Thousands of people who may never have met are synchronizing their voices, movements, and attention around a shared identity. For a few minutes, they behave almost like a single coordinated social unit,» he said, explaining that singing together strengthens connection and collective identity. «People sing because they feel united, but the act of singing may make them feel more united.»
The same phenomenon appears at religious gatherings, vigils, and protests. Earlier this year, at the height of ICE violence in Minnesota, trending clips showed residents joining in songs of protest. Among them was Sarina Partridge, a co-founder of the Twin Cities Resistance Singers. Her path began when she was an elementary school teacher and noticed that having her classes sing «transformed them from a group of nervous kids into a community.» She went on to study resistance singing in places such as South Africa and Spain's Basque Country and helped create a national toolkit for singing-centered public action.
When Renee Good was killed by ICE, that toolkit was put to use. «It was unclear how to organize big actions because people were really afraid,» Partridge said. «But a big group of people singing is so much safer. It helps people feel safe, and I've observed singing to be literally disarming.» She recalled walking frigid streets with crowds of singers while people who had been hiding inside their homes came to their porches to listen, some smiling. One person held a pet puppy to a window, creating a moment of levity and human connection.
Group singing has long served as a tool of resistance, from protests against Apartheid in Cape Town to Civil Rights marches in Selma, Alabama. In 1989, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia helped overthrow Soviet occupation after roughly 2 million citizens joined hands in a human chain spanning about 430 miles across the three nations. They sang together for 15 minutes.
«Political turmoil can produce uncertainty, stress, isolation, and a feeling that forces around us are much larger than we are. Singing doesn't make those forces disappear,» Russo said. «But singing together can change how people experience themselves in relation to them.»
The context for the choir boom is stark. The 2025 World Happiness Report ranked the United States with its lowest score ever, citing cost of living and political uncertainty. More than half of young Americans struggle with climate anxiety, and a Pew Research survey found that 69% of Americans are dissatisfied with the state of their country.
For participants, the appeal is often simpler than the research. One singer described joining a secular community choir without knowing how to read music, drawn by the chance to sing anonymously. The group, billed as «drinkers with a singing problem» and requiring no auditions, began practice with a happy hour before light-hearted rehearsals. Singing an old Appalachian hymn alongside more than 100 voices, the singer felt something unexpected but long familiar to human beings. Months later, at an Elks Lodge on a sweltering Denver evening as smoke blanketed the Rocky Mountains, the same choir sang four songs from the 1990s with a local band, just for fun. Anxiety had not vanished, but the room offered something else: a shared voice.
4
